Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Don Roberts, John Brant, Kent Beck, Martin Fowler, William Opdyke

Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code



Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code pdf download




Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code Don Roberts, John Brant, Kent Beck, Martin Fowler, William Opdyke ebook
Format: pdf
ISBN: 0201485672, 9780201485677
Page: 468
Publisher: Addison-Wesley Professional


At the same time, as already suggested by Kapser and Godfrey [5], there are several situations where code duplication seems to be a reasonable or even a beneficial design option. April 28, 2011 § Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code, by Martin Fowler. Martin Fowler's discussion book and catalogue of common refactorings is a hugely interesting read. Fowler, “Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code” location 3320; B. Where Did Refactoring Come From? Ξ April 28th, 2011 | → Comments Off | ∇ Books |. One of the great books I read about refactoring was, “Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code”, this book is unbelievable, I recommend everyone to read it. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code (@bookpool) (@amazon) Because all code can be better. Refactoring Improving the Design of Existing Code Replacing the Conditional Logic on Price Code with Polymorphism . In this post I'll discuss some of the disadvantages of modules, and suggest that Ruby programmers should see them as a method of last resort for code sharing only after carefully considering alternative approaches such as creating classes. Fowler, Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code, Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston, Ma, USA, 1999. I think this is the single greatest book on improving software that has ever been written. The concept of 'Code smells' was popularized by Kent Beck and Martin Fowler in the book 'Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code' (ISBN 978-0201485677). Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Guided by Tests” location 1258; M. Martin, “SRP: The Single Responsibility Principle”, http://www.objectmentor.com/resources/articles/srp.pdf. Hence, it is correct and useful to detect clones in the code, but refactoring is not .. Final Thoughts Refactoring Helps You Find Bugs .